Race Photos are Too Expensive
The title says it all, but I’ll repeat it…
Race Photos are Too Expensive!
I respect the work that goes into shooting events and I do think the photographers should receive their compensation. But I also don’t think that we as runners should be gouged to get the pics. We’ve already paid hefty fees for race entry and sometimes travel expenses are involved. I don’t want to buy prints of all my race photos, I just want digital copies. And even then, I don’t want to spend $80 to get a CD or a download of print-ready digital versions. I’ll admit it, I’m cheap!
I think race photographers need to offer another option for getting digital versions of race photos: the web-optimized package. Most people probably would like to share their race pics on blogs, Facebook, email, etc. So if there was an option that cost about $25 where runners could get all of their images with a maximum long side of 600 pixels, that would be plenty big to share in online venues, but not high enough quality to print. And I imagine the photo companies would make even more money if they offered something like this because tightwads like myself might consider paying that.
I don’t want to steal the proofs and post them on my public blog so…
If you want to check out my photos from the recent Rock ‘n’ Roll Las Vegas half, you can see that they actually turned out pretty decent. It seems that if I run by myself in a big race, the photogs actually find me!
View the 2009 Rock ‘n’ Roll Las Vegas Half marathon pics
If you’ve got additional thoughts on race photos, leave them in the comments!














Facebook
Twitter
RSS
AboutMe
As a race photographer who is also a runner, I'm constantly irritated at how much the race photos cost, BUT... I also know you're not just paying for the photos. I carry over $10,000 of photography equipment when I shoot a race. I also carry insurance for that equipment and for liability. I also have to pay for my education (still paying off those student loans) and for my business expenses. What photographers charge runners is so frequently a source of tension and frustration, and I hate paying money for photos of me running when I'm a photographer myself and know their shots aren't as good as mine! ; ) What I can say is, before everyone gets too upset about it, please bear in mind just how expensive it is to be a photographer and pay for the equipment, viewing gallery sites, etc. Also, for every hour a photographer is on the course with you, he/she is spending multiple hours in the digital darkroom of their computers, processing and refining the photographs and prepping them for upload and purchase. When you break it all out, it's actually barely minimum wage. So please, bear that in mind before you get TOO upset about what is being charged. Yes, it costs $.21 to produce a print. Yes, a download is free. That's not what you're paying for.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like